OBAMAISM: IN HIS OWN WORDS

Now that you've read and understand "Who killed the Constitution," "The Conservative Mind," "Liberty and Tyranny," have studied Blackstone and Madison, Jefferson and Bastiat, Locke and Smith, as well as the Declaration of Independence and our Constitution (and understand the 20 year deal), are familiar with the CATO Letters, the federalist and anti-federalist papers, and Mr. Obama's book "The Audacity of Hope," his other writings and speeches, let's take a close look at the words of Mr. Obama:

WHILE I AGREE SLAVERY IS A GREAT STAIN ON OUR PAST, I ALSO UNDERSTAND THE IMMEDIACY OF FORMING A UNION AT THAT TIME FOR OUR VERY SURVIVAL AND THAT THERE WERE A FEW POWERFUL STATES THAT WOULD NOT HAVE JOINED THE OTHER STATES IF IT WEREN'T FOR THE 20-YEAR DEAL. LET'S ALL FAST FORWARD TO TODAY: WE NOW KNOW ALL PEOPLE MEANS ALL PEOPLE- ALL RACES, CREEDS, NATIONALITY, ETC. THE LEFT IS SO STUCK ON THIS ISSUE, UNABLE TO GROW UP AND MOVE FORWARD. WE KNOW THE PRINCIPLES OF OUR FOUNDING DOCUMENTS APPLY TO ALL PEOPLE, PERIOD. SO WHY THE CONTINUED FASCINATION? THE 13TH, 14TH AND 15TH AMENDMENT ADDRESSED THAT "STAIN" BY 1870, AND OUR REPUBLIC MOVED FORWARD. BUT DIVISIVE LANGUAGE CREATES DIVISIVENESS. SPECIAL BOXES CREATE PEOPLE WITH SPECIAL NEEDS. AND WE NOW HAVE INSTITUTIONAL SLAVERY AND INSTITUTIONAL RACISM- A WHOLE NEW REASON TO HATE, FUELED BY AMASSING CHOKING DEBT AND PLAYING ON OUR FEARS. BOTH WILL BE THEIR BEST USED TOOLS MOVING FORWARD.

So why this?:
From Obama: "The document (CONSTITUTION) they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, .."  PLAYING ON OUT FEARS, which goes hand in hand with choking debt.

THE CONCEPT OF PERFECTION IS SIGNIFICANT, FOR SUCH IS NOT POSSIBLE IN OUR PHYSICAL WORLD. YES, WE SHOULD STRIVE FOR A "MORE PERFECT UNION," BUT ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS MR. OBAMA HAS USED SPECIFIC WORDS STATING HIS JOB IS TO "PERFECT" THE CONSTITUTION (UTOPIA), WHICH WOULD REQUIRE, AMONG OTHER THINGS, A POWERFUL, CENTRALIZED, NATIONALISTIC, SINGLE-SOVEREIGN GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE.

Obama says: "a union that could be and should be perfected over time." His dream is his dream because of the misuse and misunderstanding of the 17th Amendment, which gives liberals the permission they need to minimize and criticize the 9th and 10th Amendments. Reassembling the Crown our Constitution so eloquently dismantled and disseminated among the separated powers.

IT SEEMS HE IS BENT ON ENDING SLAVERY AGAIN, BY REENSLAVING EVERYONE, EQUALLY. OBVIOUSLY HE IS SUFFERING FROM HIS OWN PERSONAL INADEQUACIES AND REFLECTING THEM ON OUR (r)EPUBLIC AND THE PEOPLE-AT-LARGE:
"I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites."
AND
"There was something about him (HIS FATHER) that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white."
AND
"I found solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race"
AND
"I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the Black man, son of Africa, that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself, the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela." (note: You must read and study the words and concepts of Mandela; the "picture" our media has painted of him is highly distorted.)
AND
"I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

LET'S GET PAST THE BLACK/WHITE AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN ISSUE AND MOVE ON TO BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL, (r)EPUBLICAN PHILOSOPHY:
PLEASE TELL ME WHERE I CAN FIND THAT OUR FOUNDERS LAUNCHED A DEMOCRACY?

Obama wrote: "Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787."

Mr. Obama has, for years, called on changes of basic American philosophy. Several years before presidential candidate Obama, he often spoke of fundamental flaws in our constitution that do not allow for free distribution of wealth. He has since confirmed the same concerns, including that the Constitution is a "charter of negative liberties." This acknowledgment on his part clearly tells me that he does in fact understand American constitutionalism, but wholly disagrees with it! (it might help you if you research the variations to “negative” and “positive” law) -- The Constitution (as I hope you already understand) was not meant to confer any rights, was not to create rights, but to simply establish man-made institutions -with limited and purposefully cumbersome powers- to form "a more perfect union" of sovereign states, aimed at protecting already-existing states rights under our already-existing republican union of sovereign states (continued state sovereignty is clear when one reads the 9th and 10th Amendments, republican in form, as per Article IV, section IV). Nothing is stated or inferred suggesting the limited federal (not national!) government was to possess the powers of a Sovereign; further proofed by the known lack of General Police Powers.  Even a simple, critical reading of our Constitution's Preamble proves this out: to PROMOTE (not provide) the general welfare.

Clearly Obama believes everyone has a "right" to property, but not the right to pursue property, and certainly he believes that the allodial title holder is the "national" government..This Obama philosophy turns everything we classic conservatives hold near and dear, destroying even the minutest building block of classic American Liberty. Yes, this concept has been with us since The New Deal. But with all other Presidents we have at least been left with the perception of continued liberty -or at least a chance of a return to it. However, the boldness of his audacity has me sickened, confused, and worried about our future -- the future of Liberty around the world.

Now we have the Congress catering to Castro and communist Cuba, and Mr. Obama greeting Hugo Chavez with a "hip" style handshake --the same freak who had to cleanse his office of evil spirits after the departure of our former "arrogant, even derisive" President Bush, even meeting with the likes of Akmadinajad. We have Supreme Court justices and the President of the Senate, calling for international law to influence American courts AND American culture.

I joined the military back in the 1980's to try to make amends for my past sins. I joined the National Guard in 2005 to help promote peace and Liberty. And now I must try to separate from the National Guard to help continue the promotion of Liberty, even at the expense of my own personal freedom.

Perhaps what we actually need is an active, unbuffered Obama for a short spell so that we the people will have the opportunity to watch and see and feel the changes he and his liberal friends wish to bestow upon, and over, republican values.

The need for speed, exercised by this Congress and this President is obvious: they wish to rebuild the foundation of America before the people wake up. I pray the enemy is not successful.



Powered by counter.bloke.com